Lecture notes · Theory of Literature · Lecture 1

Introduction

Yale ENGL 300 Introduction to Theory of Literature, lecture 1, explained in plain English

Want this lecture to stick? In LessonBound you get checked practice questions for every part, can ask about anything you don't get, and can listen with your screen off. Free, no ads.

Learn this lecture free

Watch or read the original lecture: Open Yale Courses.

Part 1 · 0:00–10:00

This opening part explains what theory means, how it differs from practice and philosophy, and why the course keeps asking what literature is.

Key ideas

The word theory has been used to mean practice in some periods and the opposite of practice in others. The speaker likes the sense of theory as the idea that practice comes from. 0:47
Theory and methodology are different. Methodology is theory put to use, but not every idea in theory has a direct use right away. 1:12
Theory is like philosophy because both ask deep questions. But theory usually includes skepticism, which means doubting the foundations of what we think we know. 4:36
A central question in theory is what literature is and how we can define it. Many definitions have been proposed, and each one has exceptions. 6:22
One view says literature may not have one fixed definition. It may be whatever a community of readers says it is. The speaker says this is not a big problem, because we can still study those ideas. He also says the course will try hard to define literature carefully. 8:01

Words to know

theory: A big idea or set of ideas that tries to explain how something works or what it is. It can be a guess or a plan that is not yet tested in practice.
methodology: A set of steps or methods used to do a job, such as studying a text. The lesson says it is theory that has been put to use.
skepticism: A habit of doubting ideas and asking whether they are really true before accepting them.
definition: An exact statement of what a word or thing means, so we can tell what does and does not belong to it.

Example

Think of a recipe for bread. The idea of how yeast makes dough rise is like theory, and the steps you follow in the kitchen are like methodology. Theory can exist even before you bake, and the steps are how the idea gets used.

3 checked practice questions for this part are in the app.

Part 2 · 10:00–20:00

This part explains the big questions literary theory asks, such as what literature is, who writes and reads it, how reading works, and how theory differs from literary criticism.

Key ideas

Literary theory asks what causes literature and what effects it has. Those questions lead to two others: what is an author, and what is a reader? 10:21
The course moves from the idea that language causes literature, to the idea that the human mind causes it, to the idea that social, economic, and historical forces cause it. 11:08
Theory's most basic question is how reading gets done. It asks how a reader can be sure they are interpreting a text well, and what the experience of reading is like. 11:34
Literary theory does not judge whether a work is good or bad, or focus on how much we enjoy it. Literary criticism does those things, and theory takes them for granted. 19:12
What is new in theory is skepticism. Criticism usually supports a set group of accepted great works, called a canon, while theory questions that group. 19:37

Words to know

hermeneutics: The study of how we understand and interpret texts, meaning how we connect with a text and figure out what it says.
canon: The group of books or works that people have agreed are the most important or respected.
skepticism: A habit of doubting or questioning ideas instead of accepting them without proof.
evaluation: Judging how good or bad something is.

Example

Think of getting a letter from a friend. You wonder who wrote it and why, what they meant, and whether you understood it correctly. Theory asks similar questions about books, such as who wrote them, who reads them, and how a reader can be sure they understood the text. This comparison is an everyday illustration, not something from the lecture.

3 checked practice questions for this part are in the app.

Part 3 · 20:00–30:00

This part explains why many twentieth-century thinkers doubt that interpretation can reach the truth, and traces that doubt back through Descartes, Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Nietzsche.

Key ideas

Modern theory is skeptical in a way older literary criticism usually is not. Older criticism tends to affirm a set of important works, while theory doubts the foundations of its subject and of its own methods. 20:00
Descartes started from doubt, asking whether he might be crazy. He settled the matter with "I think, therefore I am," which set up a useful distance between the mind and the things it thinks about. 22:54
Kant said we cannot know the thing in itself. We can only approach it indirectly, so the distance between the knower and the world begins to look like a danger. 24:08
Hegel described an "unhappy consciousness" that feels alienated, or cut off, from what it looks at. Even so, he still trusted consciousness itself. 25:12
Marx and Nietzsche went further. They argued that consciousness is also cut off from its own foundations: Marx pointed to outside social and economic forces that shape belief, and Nietzsche pointed to the nature of language, where truth is a set of worn-out figures of speech. 28:11

Words to know

modernity: The history of modern thought, starting roughly with thinkers like Descartes, Shakespeare, and Cervantes. It is not the same as Modernism, which is an early twentieth-century art movement.
thing in itself: Kant's name for reality as it actually is, apart from how we perceive it. He argued that we cannot know it directly.
unhappy consciousness: Hegel's term for a mind that feels estranged, or cut off, from the things it is trying to understand.
ideology: Beliefs that are shaped by social, historical, and economic forces that the believer does not control or even see.

Example

Think of a photo that is blurry when you hold it too close and sharp when you move back to the right distance. Descartes and the Enlightenment thinkers believed the right distance gave clear sight. Later thinkers asked whether the viewer might be wearing tinted glasses that no one notices.

3 checked practice questions for this part are in the app.

Part 4 · 30:00–39:08

The lecturer explains how Nietzsche, Marx, and Freud taught readers to doubt what seems obvious, and how that doubt shaped literary theory.

Key ideas

Nietzsche says language was once a useful tool for truth, but its words and images are now worn out. Those worn-out figures of speech shape what we believe is true. 30:00
Language shapes thought. Because of this, what we see as true can be distorted by the state of language we inherit. 30:49
Freud says the unconscious is the hidden part of the mind. We cannot see it directly, so we can only infer it from the ways our conscious thoughts slip and fail. 32:21
Paul Ricoeur called Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud a 'school of suspicion.' Their approach doubts whatever looks obvious, and literary theory grew largely from this kind of doubt. 33:21
The lecturer suggests Darwin could be added as a fourth thinker of suspicion, because his ideas treat consciousness as shaped by biology. 36:27

Words to know

metaphor: A word or phrase used to describe one thing as if it were another, such as saying the sky is a blanket.
unconscious: The part of the mind where thoughts and feelings sit below our awareness, affecting what we think and say without our noticing.
hermeneutics of suspicion: A way of reading that assumes the obvious meaning of a text or idea may hide a deeper, less comfortable truth.
skepticism: A habit of doubting claims instead of accepting them at face value.

Example

Think of a friend who says 'I'm fine' while frowning and avoiding eye contact. The words seem clear, but a careful listener suspects there is more going on underneath. The hermeneutics of suspicion works the same way: it asks what is hidden beneath the obvious surface.

3 checked practice questions for this part are in the app.

Notes written by AI (Claude) from the lecture's official transcript, so check anything important against the lecture. Open Yale Courses · CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 · not affiliated with or endorsed by Yale. These notes are shared under the same license.

LessonBound · Free lecture notes · Privacy · Terms · New York